https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168800 The Supreme Court held that the properties were burdened with obligations in favor of specified charities, not the subject of a public charitable trust. The compromise decree did not establish a public trust but imposed a charge on the properties. The appeal was allowed, dismissing the plaintiffs' suit for a scheme. The properties in the appellants' possession were declared subject to the charge in favor of the charities specified in the 1919 trust deed. Each party was directed to bear their own costs. en-us Fri, 10 May 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Mar 2015 11:09:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168800 The Supreme Court held that the properties were burdened with obligations in favor of specified charities, not the subject of a public charitable trust. The compromise decree did not establish a public trust but imposed a charge on the properties. The appeal was allowed, dismissing the plaintiffs' suit for a scheme. The properties in the appellants' possession were declared subject to the charge in favor of the charities specified in the 1919 trust deed. Each party was directed to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 May 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168800