<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 919 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168798</link>
    <description>HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s deletion of an addition under section 69 relating to alleged unexplained investment in penny stocks, finding the assessee produced share transfer certificates and that purchases and sales were genuine. Revenue did not demonstrate that shares remained with the assessee or that sale proceeds exceeded declared amounts. Minor discrepancies in a director&#039;s statement were outweighed by corroborative employee testimony. The Assessing Officer&#039;s treatment as unexplained investment was reversed; decision in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 919 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168798</link>
      <description>HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s deletion of an addition under section 69 relating to alleged unexplained investment in penny stocks, finding the assessee produced share transfer certificates and that purchases and sales were genuine. Revenue did not demonstrate that shares remained with the assessee or that sale proceeds exceeded declared amounts. Minor discrepancies in a director&#039;s statement were outweighed by corroborative employee testimony. The Assessing Officer&#039;s treatment as unexplained investment was reversed; decision in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>