<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 913 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257979</link>
    <description>Concurrent findings that the assessee had effected taxable sales of Chhakdo rickshaws, rather than mere job-work, were upheld because they were supported by reassessment material, the dealer&#039;s response, and evidence on record. The reassessment was not vitiated as resting solely on the excise department&#039;s notice; the authority independently examined the case and considered the dealer&#039;s explanation. On facts, the assessee failed to produce bills or other documentary proof that engines, chassis and spare parts had been purchased by third-party customers for job-work, and the rickshaws were registered by the dealer itself. The High Court found no perversity in the Tribunal&#039;s order and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 913 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257979</link>
      <description>Concurrent findings that the assessee had effected taxable sales of Chhakdo rickshaws, rather than mere job-work, were upheld because they were supported by reassessment material, the dealer&#039;s response, and evidence on record. The reassessment was not vitiated as resting solely on the excise department&#039;s notice; the authority independently examined the case and considered the dealer&#039;s explanation. On facts, the assessee failed to produce bills or other documentary proof that engines, chassis and spare parts had been purchased by third-party customers for job-work, and the rickshaws were registered by the dealer itself. The High Court found no perversity in the Tribunal&#039;s order and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>