<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 908 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257974</link>
    <description>The Government upheld the Order-in-Appeal, allowing rebate claims despite delayed payment of duty and for periods preceding the relevant notification. The decision was supported by CBEC Circulars and a Supreme Court judgment. Non-payment of penalty and interest was deemed unrelated to rebate claims. The department&#039;s revision application was rejected, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 908 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257974</link>
      <description>The Government upheld the Order-in-Appeal, allowing rebate claims despite delayed payment of duty and for periods preceding the relevant notification. The decision was supported by CBEC Circulars and a Supreme Court judgment. Non-payment of penalty and interest was deemed unrelated to rebate claims. The department&#039;s revision application was rejected, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>