<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 904 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257970</link>
    <description>The High Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision and reinstated the penalty imposed by the Commissioner of Customs under Section 114 of the Customs Act. The Court found that the respondent&#039;s involvement in attempting to export prohibited goods, specifically sandalwood disguised as roofing tiles, justified the penalty. The High Court held that the respondent&#039;s failure to disclose crucial information about the prohibited goods supported the penalty imposition. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and restoring the Commissioner&#039;s order without costs incurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 904 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257970</link>
      <description>The High Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision and reinstated the penalty imposed by the Commissioner of Customs under Section 114 of the Customs Act. The Court found that the respondent&#039;s involvement in attempting to export prohibited goods, specifically sandalwood disguised as roofing tiles, justified the penalty. The High Court held that the respondent&#039;s failure to disclose crucial information about the prohibited goods supported the penalty imposition. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and restoring the Commissioner&#039;s order without costs incurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>