<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 903 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257969</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the original authority, directing the petitioner to appear, submit objections, and receive a fair hearing. The authorities were instructed to issue detailed orders based on submissions, ensuring compliance with the law and disregarding the previous order. Failure to attend the hearing would empower the authority to make fresh orders. No costs were awarded in this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 903 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257969</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the original authority, directing the petitioner to appear, submit objections, and receive a fair hearing. The authorities were instructed to issue detailed orders based on submissions, ensuring compliance with the law and disregarding the previous order. Failure to attend the hearing would empower the authority to make fresh orders. No costs were awarded in this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>