https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257966 The Government concluded that the applicant is entitled to the higher drawback rate of 16% as the reversal of Cenvat credit on input services, along with interest, should be treated as non-availment. The impugned order-in-appeal was set aside, and the revision application was allowed, deeming the initial sanction of the higher drawback rate as legal and proper. en-us Thu, 06 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Mar 2015 11:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257966 The Government concluded that the applicant is entitled to the higher drawback rate of 16% as the reversal of Cenvat credit on input services, along with interest, should be treated as non-availment. The impugned order-in-appeal was set aside, and the revision application was allowed, deeming the initial sanction of the higher drawback rate as legal and proper. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 06 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257966