<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 898 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257964</link>
    <description>Educational institutions with income-tax exemption were treated as entitled to refund of additional FAR charges paid under protest after a later notification exempted educational, health-care and social welfare societies from those charges. The exemption was read as beneficial and intended to confer a benefit without affecting vested rights or causing public detriment, so the presumption against retrospectivity was displaced by fairness and parity. Institutions similarly situated to those already granted relief could not be denied the same treatment, and the exemption notification was applied retrospectively with consequential refund of the deposited amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 898 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257964</link>
      <description>Educational institutions with income-tax exemption were treated as entitled to refund of additional FAR charges paid under protest after a later notification exempted educational, health-care and social welfare societies from those charges. The exemption was read as beneficial and intended to confer a benefit without affecting vested rights or causing public detriment, so the presumption against retrospectivity was displaced by fairness and parity. Institutions similarly situated to those already granted relief could not be denied the same treatment, and the exemption notification was applied retrospectively with consequential refund of the deposited amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>