<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 886 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257952</link>
    <description>Interest on sticky advances and non-performing assets in the hands of a co-operative bank was held not to accrue as taxable income where recovery was doubtful, the amount was not brought to the profit and loss account, and RBI income-recognition norms supported the real income principle; the addition was therefore deleted. Section 14A could not be used to deny set off of carried forward losses merely because the assessee was a co-operative bank or had earlier enjoyed section 80P exemption, since the losses remained part of the computation of total income and were allowable under the Act; the disallowance was rejected. The relief granted to the assessee was sustained on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 07:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 886 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257952</link>
      <description>Interest on sticky advances and non-performing assets in the hands of a co-operative bank was held not to accrue as taxable income where recovery was doubtful, the amount was not brought to the profit and loss account, and RBI income-recognition norms supported the real income principle; the addition was therefore deleted. Section 14A could not be used to deny set off of carried forward losses merely because the assessee was a co-operative bank or had earlier enjoyed section 80P exemption, since the losses remained part of the computation of total income and were allowable under the Act; the disallowance was rejected. The relief granted to the assessee was sustained on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>