<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 879 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257945</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals in favor of the assessee. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to valid reasons beyond the assessee&#039;s control. The income from the sale of shares was assessed as long-term capital gains based on genuine evidence, overturning the previous classification as income from other sources. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deleted as there was no concealment or inaccuracies in the income declaration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 06:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 879 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257945</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals in favor of the assessee. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to valid reasons beyond the assessee&#039;s control. The income from the sale of shares was assessed as long-term capital gains based on genuine evidence, overturning the previous classification as income from other sources. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deleted as there was no concealment or inaccuracies in the income declaration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>