<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (12) TMI 26 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168776</link>
    <description>For computing the interest of a deceased Mitakshara coparcener under Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the notional partition is governed by the Act alone. Pre-existing Hindu law rules that would give the mother a share or require provision for daughters&#039; maintenance and marriage expenses do not apply, because Section 4 overrides inconsistent prior law and Section 6 creates only a limited notional partition to ascertain the deceased&#039;s share. The coparcenary interest must therefore be calculated without importing the traditional partition mechanism. The appeal was rejected and the respondent&#039;s computation of the deceased&#039;s share was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 12:59:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (12) TMI 26 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168776</link>
      <description>For computing the interest of a deceased Mitakshara coparcener under Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the notional partition is governed by the Act alone. Pre-existing Hindu law rules that would give the mother a share or require provision for daughters&#039; maintenance and marriage expenses do not apply, because Section 4 overrides inconsistent prior law and Section 6 creates only a limited notional partition to ascertain the deceased&#039;s share. The coparcenary interest must therefore be calculated without importing the traditional partition mechanism. The appeal was rejected and the respondent&#039;s computation of the deceased&#039;s share was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>