<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 873 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257939</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, with consequential relief, if any, based on judicial pronouncements and precedents cited. The Tribunal held that reimbursable travel expenses need not be included in the service tax liability, emphasizing the unsustainability of the impugned order. The appellant&#039;s argument that the reimbursed travel expenses should not be part of the service tax liability was supported by sample invoices and judicial decisions, leading to the overturning of the original order alleging contravention of the Finance Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 873 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257939</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, with consequential relief, if any, based on judicial pronouncements and precedents cited. The Tribunal held that reimbursable travel expenses need not be included in the service tax liability, emphasizing the unsustainability of the impugned order. The appellant&#039;s argument that the reimbursed travel expenses should not be part of the service tax liability was supported by sample invoices and judicial decisions, leading to the overturning of the original order alleging contravention of the Finance Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>