<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 872 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257938</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of a tender offer for a pre-fab shelter construction project due to non-disclosure of the Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN)/Central Sales Tax (CST) Number. The court held that the requirement of providing the TIN number was mandatory as per the tender terms and conditions, and the petitioner&#039;s failure to meet this requirement rendered them ineligible to proceed with the bid. The court emphasized that compliance with specific tender conditions, including the TIN number disclosure, was essential for all participants, upholding the tendering board&#039;s decision to reject the bid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 06:19:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 872 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257938</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of a tender offer for a pre-fab shelter construction project due to non-disclosure of the Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN)/Central Sales Tax (CST) Number. The court held that the requirement of providing the TIN number was mandatory as per the tender terms and conditions, and the petitioner&#039;s failure to meet this requirement rendered them ineligible to proceed with the bid. The court emphasized that compliance with specific tender conditions, including the TIN number disclosure, was essential for all participants, upholding the tendering board&#039;s decision to reject the bid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>