https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257933 The duty demand and penalties on the partnership firm were set aside due to lack of substantiated evidence. However, a reduced penalty was upheld for the individual associated with misleading statements. The judgment emphasized the importance of proper verification, burden of proof on Revenue, and adherence to legal principles in excise duty cases. en-us Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2017 11:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257933 The duty demand and penalties on the partnership firm were set aside due to lack of substantiated evidence. However, a reduced penalty was upheld for the individual associated with misleading statements. The judgment emphasized the importance of proper verification, burden of proof on Revenue, and adherence to legal principles in excise duty cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257933