<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 862 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257928</link>
    <description>The Government ruled in favor of the revision applications, setting aside the rejection of rebate claims due to procedural lapses. They emphasized that minor errors in declaration forms should not invalidate substantial rebate claims when goods were duty paid and exported under the correct notification. The Government reinstated the initial sanction of rebate claims, concluding that no recovery was warranted, and upheld the applicants&#039; position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 15:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 862 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257928</link>
      <description>The Government ruled in favor of the revision applications, setting aside the rejection of rebate claims due to procedural lapses. They emphasized that minor errors in declaration forms should not invalidate substantial rebate claims when goods were duty paid and exported under the correct notification. The Government reinstated the initial sanction of rebate claims, concluding that no recovery was warranted, and upheld the applicants&#039; position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>