<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 859 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257925</link>
    <description>The Government upheld the orders-in-appeal in a customs case involving the competency of the AC/DC to condone delay in filing drawback claims. The department challenged the delay in filing claims and fee payment, arguing for rejection. However, the Government found the delay was within permissible limits and that the AC/DC rightfully condoned it. Consequently, the revision applications were rejected, and the orders-in-appeal were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 06:16:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 859 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257925</link>
      <description>The Government upheld the orders-in-appeal in a customs case involving the competency of the AC/DC to condone delay in filing drawback claims. The department challenged the delay in filing claims and fee payment, arguing for rejection. However, the Government found the delay was within permissible limits and that the AC/DC rightfully condoned it. Consequently, the revision applications were rejected, and the orders-in-appeal were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>