<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 848 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257914</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded the issue of treatment of expenditure on replacement of plant and machinery back to the CIT (Appeals) for detailed consideration, following legal precedents and emphasizing the need for specific material. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the allowance of 100% depreciation on specified items, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 848 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257914</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded the issue of treatment of expenditure on replacement of plant and machinery back to the CIT (Appeals) for detailed consideration, following legal precedents and emphasizing the need for specific material. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the allowance of 100% depreciation on specified items, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>