<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Requirement We want some Judgment of Tribunal on these above mentioned issues.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=108303</link>
    <description>The document explains that normal limitation rules govern issuance of show cause notices but a department may invoke an extended period of limitation where nondisclosure is later discovered; if a taxpayer previously disclosed information and holds a dated departmental acknowledgement, issuing an SCN many years later is argued to be impermissible and unlikely to survive appellate scrutiny.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:00:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Requirement We want some Judgment of Tribunal on these above mentioned issues.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=108303</link>
      <description>The document explains that normal limitation rules govern issuance of show cause notices but a department may invoke an extended period of limitation where nondisclosure is later discovered; if a taxpayer previously disclosed information and holds a dated departmental acknowledgement, issuing an SCN many years later is argued to be impermissible and unlikely to survive appellate scrutiny.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:00:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=108303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>