<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue&#039;s Case u/s 68 Fails Due to Unavailable Cross-Examination of Witnesses; Lacks Additional Evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22229</link>
    <description>Addition under section 68 - Such could be proved by the Revenue in the present case through the statement of the persons, but unfortunately, they were not made available for crossexamination and therefore, the statements could be used as an evidence against the asseessee. No other evidence was available with the Revenue. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:27:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:27:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue&#039;s Case u/s 68 Fails Due to Unavailable Cross-Examination of Witnesses; Lacks Additional Evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22229</link>
      <description>Addition under section 68 - Such could be proved by the Revenue in the present case through the statement of the persons, but unfortunately, they were not made available for crossexamination and therefore, the statements could be used as an evidence against the asseessee. No other evidence was available with the Revenue. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:27:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>