<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 827 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257893</link>
    <description>Under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, pension may be withheld or withdrawn for grave misconduct or negligence, but where the pensioner does not agree to the proposed action, prior consultation with the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission is mandatory. The High Court held that non-compliance with this consultative requirement vitiated the pension-cut order. It also found the punishment unsustainable on merits because the petitioner was only the issuing authority for transit passes, no corresponding action was shown against the dealer, the relevant assessment had attained finality, and disciplinary proceedings were initiated belatedly after retirement without adequate explanation. The cut in pension was therefore set aside and the recovered amounts were ordered to be refunded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 827 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257893</link>
      <description>Under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, pension may be withheld or withdrawn for grave misconduct or negligence, but where the pensioner does not agree to the proposed action, prior consultation with the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission is mandatory. The High Court held that non-compliance with this consultative requirement vitiated the pension-cut order. It also found the punishment unsustainable on merits because the petitioner was only the issuing authority for transit passes, no corresponding action was shown against the dealer, the relevant assessment had attained finality, and disciplinary proceedings were initiated belatedly after retirement without adequate explanation. The cut in pension was therefore set aside and the recovered amounts were ordered to be refunded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>