<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 827 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257893</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the punishment order cutting the petitioner&#039;s pension. The court found procedural violations and lack of merit in the charges against the petitioner. It directed the refund of any amount recovered from the petitioner and closed the related Miscellaneous Petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 827 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257893</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the punishment order cutting the petitioner&#039;s pension. The court found procedural violations and lack of merit in the charges against the petitioner. It directed the refund of any amount recovered from the petitioner and closed the related Miscellaneous Petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>