<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 823 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257889</link>
    <description>The government remanded the matter back to the original authority to decide afresh the rebate claims to the extent of disputed amounts of Rs. 55,661 and Rs. 1,975. The original authority is instructed to verify if the difference in ARE-1 value and FOB value is due to exchange rate differences and not freight and insurance. The original authority must provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the concerned parties. The revision applications are disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 823 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257889</link>
      <description>The government remanded the matter back to the original authority to decide afresh the rebate claims to the extent of disputed amounts of Rs. 55,661 and Rs. 1,975. The original authority is instructed to verify if the difference in ARE-1 value and FOB value is due to exchange rate differences and not freight and insurance. The original authority must provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the concerned parties. The revision applications are disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>