<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 821 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257887</link>
    <description>The judgment upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions to sanction rebates at the effective duty rate of 4% and re-credit the excess duty paid. The revision applications were rejected, with the court emphasizing the need for uniform application of the duty rate and compliance with statutory provisions. Arguments regarding the choice of notifications and treatment of free samples were deemed lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 821 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257887</link>
      <description>The judgment upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions to sanction rebates at the effective duty rate of 4% and re-credit the excess duty paid. The revision applications were rejected, with the court emphasizing the need for uniform application of the duty rate and compliance with statutory provisions. Arguments regarding the choice of notifications and treatment of free samples were deemed lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>