<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 820 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257886</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeals, upholding the findings of abetment, denial of natural justice, reliance on mobile records and confessional statements, and the methodology for determining average weight. The court found substantial evidence supporting the Customs Act penalties imposed on the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 820 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257886</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeals, upholding the findings of abetment, denial of natural justice, reliance on mobile records and confessional statements, and the methodology for determining average weight. The court found substantial evidence supporting the Customs Act penalties imposed on the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>