<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 819 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257885</link>
    <description>The court upheld the respondent&#039;s authority to issue Ext.P10 under Regulation 23 but emphasized the necessity of limiting the prohibition order&#039;s duration to safeguard the petitioner&#039;s rights. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to challenge any subsequent orders if detrimental to their interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 819 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257885</link>
      <description>The court upheld the respondent&#039;s authority to issue Ext.P10 under Regulation 23 but emphasized the necessity of limiting the prohibition order&#039;s duration to safeguard the petitioner&#039;s rights. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to challenge any subsequent orders if detrimental to their interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>