<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 803 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257869</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and upheld the AO&#039;s disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia), interpreting &quot;payable&quot; to include both paid and payable amounts. The matter was remanded to the AO to consider the applicability of the second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) inserted by the Finance Act, 2012. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 08:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 803 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257869</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and upheld the AO&#039;s disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia), interpreting &quot;payable&quot; to include both paid and payable amounts. The matter was remanded to the AO to consider the applicability of the second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) inserted by the Finance Act, 2012. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>