<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (8) TMI 301 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168735</link>
    <description>Demanding money from the parents of a bride during marriage ceremonies, where it is made as consideration for the marriage, falls within section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The statutory scheme treats the demand for dowry itself as the punishable act, and the offence is complete once such a demand is made; prior agreement, consent, or actual payment is not required. Read with the Act&#039;s object of prohibiting dowry in any form before or after marriage, a narrow interpretation would defeat legislative intent. The complaint therefore disclosed a prima facie offence, and quashing of the proceedings was unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (8) TMI 301 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168735</link>
      <description>Demanding money from the parents of a bride during marriage ceremonies, where it is made as consideration for the marriage, falls within section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The statutory scheme treats the demand for dowry itself as the punishable act, and the offence is complete once such a demand is made; prior agreement, consent, or actual payment is not required. Read with the Act&#039;s object of prohibiting dowry in any form before or after marriage, a narrow interpretation would defeat legislative intent. The complaint therefore disclosed a prima facie offence, and quashing of the proceedings was unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>