<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 658 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168734</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned judgments and directed the release of the property from attachment. The respondent was ordered to refund a sum with interest, and the deposit made by another party was to be refunded. The 3rd respondent was allowed to pursue remedies against her husband, pending cases were to be expedited, and costs were awarded to the appellant. The appeals were allowed, ensuring the protection of the appellants&#039; rights and the administration of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 658 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168734</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned judgments and directed the release of the property from attachment. The respondent was ordered to refund a sum with interest, and the deposit made by another party was to be refunded. The 3rd respondent was allowed to pursue remedies against her husband, pending cases were to be expedited, and costs were awarded to the appellant. The appeals were allowed, ensuring the protection of the appellants&#039; rights and the administration of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>