<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 658 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168734</link>
    <description>A married wife&#039;s maintenance claim during the husband&#039;s lifetime cannot be enforced against the mother-in-law&#039;s separate property, because the statutory duty to maintain rests on the husband and, in appropriate cases, property in which he has an enforceable share. Attachment under criminal procedure is only a securing measure and cannot be continued or converted into sale for a third party&#039;s benefit once its purpose is achieved. Bail cancellation also requires distinct legal grounds such as misuse of liberty or evasion of process; on the facts, no sustainable basis for cancellation was shown and the cancellation order could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 658 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168734</link>
      <description>A married wife&#039;s maintenance claim during the husband&#039;s lifetime cannot be enforced against the mother-in-law&#039;s separate property, because the statutory duty to maintain rests on the husband and, in appropriate cases, property in which he has an enforceable share. Attachment under criminal procedure is only a securing measure and cannot be continued or converted into sale for a third party&#039;s benefit once its purpose is achieved. Bail cancellation also requires distinct legal grounds such as misuse of liberty or evasion of process; on the facts, no sustainable basis for cancellation was shown and the cancellation order could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>