https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168733 The majority judgment in the case allowed the petition, quashed the order of the Government of Madras, and declared Section 9 (1-A) of the Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949, void and unconstitutional. The dissenting opinion by Fazl Ali J. argued that the law was constitutional and aimed at maintaining public order and safety. en-us Fri, 26 May 1950 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:07:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168733 The majority judgment in the case allowed the petition, quashed the order of the Government of Madras, and declared Section 9 (1-A) of the Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949, void and unconstitutional. The dissenting opinion by Fazl Ali J. argued that the law was constitutional and aimed at maintaining public order and safety. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 May 1950 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168733