https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168729 Entrusted funds dealt with contrary to the society's bye-laws can amount to criminal breach of trust, and falsification of accounts may be inferred where entries are manipulated to show an authorised disbursement. A board resolution cannot validate advances made in breach of the bye-laws unless there is lawful authority to override the prescribed mode of dealing with trust money, so ratification fails. Charges under sections 408 and 477-A of the IPC may be tried jointly when they arise from the same transaction and no failure of justice from joinder is shown. A certificate of fitness under Article 134(1)(c) is not justified absent a substantial question of law. en-us Mon, 23 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:31:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168729 Entrusted funds dealt with contrary to the society's bye-laws can amount to criminal breach of trust, and falsification of accounts may be inferred where entries are manipulated to show an authorised disbursement. A board resolution cannot validate advances made in breach of the bye-laws unless there is lawful authority to override the prescribed mode of dealing with trust money, so ratification fails. Charges under sections 408 and 477-A of the IPC may be tried jointly when they arise from the same transaction and no failure of justice from joinder is shown. A certificate of fitness under Article 134(1)(c) is not justified absent a substantial question of law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 23 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168729