https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168729 The Judicial Commissioner allowed the appeal against one accused for criminal breach of trust and falsification of accounts, sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment. The acquittal of the co-accused was challenged but dismissed, as the evidence against the appellant, particularly his role as Secretary, supported the charges of embezzlement and falsification. The appellant's actions were scrutinized in light of Byelaws, highlighting breaches of trust and accounting irregularities. The appeal for Supreme Court certification was denied due to the absence of substantial legal questions, emphasizing the limited scope for appeal in criminal cases. en-us Mon, 23 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:31:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168729 The Judicial Commissioner allowed the appeal against one accused for criminal breach of trust and falsification of accounts, sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment. The acquittal of the co-accused was challenged but dismissed, as the evidence against the appellant, particularly his role as Secretary, supported the charges of embezzlement and falsification. The appellant's actions were scrutinized in light of Byelaws, highlighting breaches of trust and accounting irregularities. The appeal for Supreme Court certification was denied due to the absence of substantial legal questions, emphasizing the limited scope for appeal in criminal cases. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 23 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168729