<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 1039 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168726</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, vacating the temporary injunction that precluded the Issuing Bank from reimbursing the Negotiating Bank. The Court clarified that the injunction would not prevent the Issuing Bank from fulfilling its obligation to reimburse the Negotiating Bank. The appeal was allowed with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:07:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 1039 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168726</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, vacating the temporary injunction that precluded the Issuing Bank from reimbursing the Negotiating Bank. The Court clarified that the injunction would not prevent the Issuing Bank from fulfilling its obligation to reimburse the Negotiating Bank. The appeal was allowed with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>