<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (11) TMI 10 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168722</link>
    <description>In an appeal against acquittal, an appellate court may reappreciate evidence only while giving due weight to the trial court&#039;s assessment, the presumption of innocence, and the accused&#039;s benefit of doubt; the discussion states that reversal is unsustainable where material discrepancies and relevant circumstances were not properly considered. It also explains that criminal breach of trust requires clear entrustment of property and dishonest misappropriation or conversion, and that payment characterised as a secret profit or bribe does not by itself establish entrustment. On the facts discussed, the ingredients of criminal breach of trust were not made out and the conviction could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:30:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (11) TMI 10 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168722</link>
      <description>In an appeal against acquittal, an appellate court may reappreciate evidence only while giving due weight to the trial court&#039;s assessment, the presumption of innocence, and the accused&#039;s benefit of doubt; the discussion states that reversal is unsustainable where material discrepancies and relevant circumstances were not properly considered. It also explains that criminal breach of trust requires clear entrustment of property and dishonest misappropriation or conversion, and that payment characterised as a secret profit or bribe does not by itself establish entrustment. On the facts discussed, the ingredients of criminal breach of trust were not made out and the conviction could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>