<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (4) TMI 168 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168715</link>
    <description>Section 3 of the Punjab Professions, Trades, Callings and Employments Taxation Act, 1956 was held to govern only liability, requiring the person to carry on the relevant activity within Punjab, while the tax base was determined by the assessment provisions in sections 2(b), 4 and 5. The Court held that computation must be made on aggregate gross income and therefore includes income earned both inside and outside Punjab. The High Court&#039;s narrower reading was rejected as inconsistent with the statutory text and as depriving the amended definition in section 2(b) of effect. The constitutional validity of the amendment was left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:19:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (4) TMI 168 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168715</link>
      <description>Section 3 of the Punjab Professions, Trades, Callings and Employments Taxation Act, 1956 was held to govern only liability, requiring the person to carry on the relevant activity within Punjab, while the tax base was determined by the assessment provisions in sections 2(b), 4 and 5. The Court held that computation must be made on aggregate gross income and therefore includes income earned both inside and outside Punjab. The High Court&#039;s narrower reading was rejected as inconsistent with the statutory text and as depriving the amended definition in section 2(b) of effect. The constitutional validity of the amendment was left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>