https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168713 A deeming amendment to Section 33(1) treats agreements within the specified clauses as restrictive trade practices without a fresh inquiry under the general definition in Section 2(o). Even so, proceedings for coercive relief require a separate examination of whether the practice is prejudicial to the public interest and whether the statutory gateways in Section 38 are satisfied. A finding that an agreement is restrictive does not by itself justify a cease-and-desist direction unless the Commission records reasoned findings on the material and the relevant exceptions. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with the Act. en-us Tue, 07 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 May 2015 10:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168713 A deeming amendment to Section 33(1) treats agreements within the specified clauses as restrictive trade practices without a fresh inquiry under the general definition in Section 2(o). Even so, proceedings for coercive relief require a separate examination of whether the practice is prejudicial to the public interest and whether the statutory gateways in Section 38 are satisfied. A finding that an agreement is restrictive does not by itself justify a cease-and-desist direction unless the Commission records reasoned findings on the material and the relevant exceptions. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168713