<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 789 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257855</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed the appellant&#039;s appeals against an Order-in-Original regarding the non-inclusion of the value of free electricity in the service tax liability. The Tribunal relied on its previous order in favor of the appellant on a similar issue for an earlier period. The decision was supported by the Central Board of Excise and Customs&#039; decision not to challenge the earlier order. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed based on the Tribunal&#039;s precedent, emphasizing the importance of legal consistency and resulting in a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 789 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257855</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed the appellant&#039;s appeals against an Order-in-Original regarding the non-inclusion of the value of free electricity in the service tax liability. The Tribunal relied on its previous order in favor of the appellant on a similar issue for an earlier period. The decision was supported by the Central Board of Excise and Customs&#039; decision not to challenge the earlier order. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed based on the Tribunal&#039;s precedent, emphasizing the importance of legal consistency and resulting in a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>