https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257841 Preventive detention under challenge was upheld where the later detention order was treated as a continuation of the earlier order after the detenu surrendered before service and the changed factual position was considered by the authority. The authority had taken into account subsequent developments, including surrender, and was not required to treat the matter as a fresh detention proposal. The detenu's representation was considered within a reasonable time, with no unexplained delay under Article 22(5). Pending investigation or absence of a charge-sheet did not vitiate detention, and minor defects in translation or supply of documents caused no prejudice to the detenu's ability to make an effective representation. en-us Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257841 Preventive detention under challenge was upheld where the later detention order was treated as a continuation of the earlier order after the detenu surrendered before service and the changed factual position was considered by the authority. The authority had taken into account subsequent developments, including surrender, and was not required to treat the matter as a fresh detention proposal. The detenu's representation was considered within a reasonable time, with no unexplained delay under Article 22(5). Pending investigation or absence of a charge-sheet did not vitiate detention, and minor defects in translation or supply of documents caused no prejudice to the detenu's ability to make an effective representation. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257841