https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168712 Termination of a probationer during the extended probation period for failure to meet the stipulated business norm and for unsatisfactory performance was treated as termination under the contract and the governing probation regulation. It fell within the exclusion in clause (bb) of Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act, so it was not retrenchment and Section 25-F did not apply. The amended service framework under the Life Insurance Corporation Act, together with Regulation 14 having overriding effect, governed probationary discharge and prevailed over the Industrial Disputes Act on this issue, leaving the termination valid. en-us Mon, 31 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:29:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168712 Termination of a probationer during the extended probation period for failure to meet the stipulated business norm and for unsatisfactory performance was treated as termination under the contract and the governing probation regulation. It fell within the exclusion in clause (bb) of Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act, so it was not retrenchment and Section 25-F did not apply. The amended service framework under the Life Insurance Corporation Act, together with Regulation 14 having overriding effect, governed probationary discharge and prevailed over the Industrial Disputes Act on this issue, leaving the termination valid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 31 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168712