<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Advocate Not Criminally Liable for Client&#039;s Forged TDS Certificates, High Court Rules; Focus on Submission Role Only.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22210</link>
    <description>Refund on the basis of forged TDS certificates - criminal prosecution - respondent-accused, who was an Advocate, had just submitted the income tax return on behalf of main assessee, cannot possibly be and indeed could not legally be held liable for criminal prosecution for procuring the documents by main assessee in order to attract the penal provisions of offences in question - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:21:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:21:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Advocate Not Criminally Liable for Client&#039;s Forged TDS Certificates, High Court Rules; Focus on Submission Role Only.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22210</link>
      <description>Refund on the basis of forged TDS certificates - criminal prosecution - respondent-accused, who was an Advocate, had just submitted the income tax return on behalf of main assessee, cannot possibly be and indeed could not legally be held liable for criminal prosecution for procuring the documents by main assessee in order to attract the penal provisions of offences in question - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:21:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>