<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 758 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257824</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the land sold was agricultural and not a capital asset under Section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act. Therefore, the profit from the sale was not taxable as capital gains. The Tribunal also found that the transaction did not constitute business income, as the assessee&#039;s intention was not to trade and the land was held for more than two years before being sold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 758 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257824</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the land sold was agricultural and not a capital asset under Section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act. Therefore, the profit from the sale was not taxable as capital gains. The Tribunal also found that the transaction did not constitute business income, as the assessee&#039;s intention was not to trade and the land was held for more than two years before being sold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>