<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (9) TMI 96 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168691</link>
    <description>Section 151 CPC cannot be used to authorise seizure of a party&#039;s account books where the Code provides no such power and instead supplies specific procedures for discovery and production of documents. An order appointing a commissioner for that purpose was therefore without jurisdiction and void. A person appointed under such an invalid order could not be treated as a public servant under Explanation 2 to Section 21 IPC, because the deeming fiction applies only where there is an existing office lawfully capable of being held. The conviction under Section 165-A IPC therefore could not stand, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 15:25:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (9) TMI 96 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168691</link>
      <description>Section 151 CPC cannot be used to authorise seizure of a party&#039;s account books where the Code provides no such power and instead supplies specific procedures for discovery and production of documents. An order appointing a commissioner for that purpose was therefore without jurisdiction and void. A person appointed under such an invalid order could not be treated as a public servant under Explanation 2 to Section 21 IPC, because the deeming fiction applies only where there is an existing office lawfully capable of being held. The conviction under Section 165-A IPC therefore could not stand, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>