https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168684 Executive directions issued under Section 43A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 could not control the quasi-judicial discretion of transport authorities when deciding rival stage carriage permit claims. The provision was limited to administrative power, so a Government order purporting to govern permit adjudication was outside its scope and invalid. As the Appellate Tribunal had treated that order as binding rather than making an independent merits determination, its decision lost its foundation and could not stand. The writ remedy of certiorari was therefore appropriate, and the Tribunal's order was set aside with the matter remitted for fresh disposal in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 05 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:09:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168684 Executive directions issued under Section 43A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 could not control the quasi-judicial discretion of transport authorities when deciding rival stage carriage permit claims. The provision was limited to administrative power, so a Government order purporting to govern permit adjudication was outside its scope and invalid. As the Appellate Tribunal had treated that order as binding rather than making an independent merits determination, its decision lost its foundation and could not stand. The writ remedy of certiorari was therefore appropriate, and the Tribunal's order was set aside with the matter remitted for fresh disposal in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168684