<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 743 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257809</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the respondent was eligible to avail Cenvat credit of Service Tax paid on insurance services for discharging their duty liability. The Court determined that the transit insurance paid by the Assessee was indirectly related to the manufacture of final products, falling within the definition of &#039;input service.&#039; As a result, the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the Department&#039;s appeal was upheld, and the High Court found no merit in the appeal, dismissing it accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 15:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 743 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257809</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the respondent was eligible to avail Cenvat credit of Service Tax paid on insurance services for discharging their duty liability. The Court determined that the transit insurance paid by the Assessee was indirectly related to the manufacture of final products, falling within the definition of &#039;input service.&#039; As a result, the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the Department&#039;s appeal was upheld, and the High Court found no merit in the appeal, dismissing it accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>