<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 738 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257804</link>
    <description>Article 226 interference was declined against the Tribunal&#039;s preliminary findings on limitation and the officer&#039;s authority to file the appeal, as the matter was at an interlocutory stage and the merits were left open for challenge in appropriate proceedings. The High Court also directed expeditious disposal of the pending appeal, ensuring that the Tribunal proceeds without further delay while preserving all parties&#039; contentions on the preliminary objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 738 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257804</link>
      <description>Article 226 interference was declined against the Tribunal&#039;s preliminary findings on limitation and the officer&#039;s authority to file the appeal, as the matter was at an interlocutory stage and the merits were left open for challenge in appropriate proceedings. The High Court also directed expeditious disposal of the pending appeal, ensuring that the Tribunal proceeds without further delay while preserving all parties&#039; contentions on the preliminary objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>