https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257791 The Commission determined that the opposite party abused its dominant position in the relevant market by imposing unfair conditions on buyers through various clauses in the Gas Sales Agreement (GSA). The Commission found violations of section 4(2)(a)(i) of the Act, particularly in clauses related to billing, payment, force majeure, and termination. As a result, the opposite party was ordered to cease such conduct, modify the GSA, and pay a penalty of 4% of its average turnover over the past three years, totaling Rs. 2567.2764 lakhs. Additionally, the opposite party was required to file an undertaking and deposit the penalty within specified timeframes. en-us Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257791 The Commission determined that the opposite party abused its dominant position in the relevant market by imposing unfair conditions on buyers through various clauses in the Gas Sales Agreement (GSA). The Commission found violations of section 4(2)(a)(i) of the Act, particularly in clauses related to billing, payment, force majeure, and termination. As a result, the opposite party was ordered to cease such conduct, modify the GSA, and pay a penalty of 4% of its average turnover over the past three years, totaling Rs. 2567.2764 lakhs. Additionally, the opposite party was required to file an undertaking and deposit the penalty within specified timeframes. Case-Laws Law of Competition Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257791