https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257754 The Court dismissed the appeal as premature, emphasizing that the valuation of shares determined by an independent valuer would only be final and binding if both parties agreed to it. The judgment highlighted the importance of mutual agreement on the valuation for it to be binding, clarifying that both parties had the liberty to challenge the valuation if aggrieved. The Court underscored the significance of mutual agreement on the valuation of shares and clarified the rights and obligations of the parties in challenging the valuation if necessary. en-us Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Dec 2014 13:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257754 The Court dismissed the appeal as premature, emphasizing that the valuation of shares determined by an independent valuer would only be final and binding if both parties agreed to it. The judgment highlighted the importance of mutual agreement on the valuation for it to be binding, clarifying that both parties had the liberty to challenge the valuation if aggrieved. The Court underscored the significance of mutual agreement on the valuation of shares and clarified the rights and obligations of the parties in challenging the valuation if necessary. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257754