<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 680 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257746</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty imposed under Section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act, amounting to Rs. 12,50,00,000/-, was not justified. The Tribunal found that the assessee had specified and substantiated the manner in which the undisclosed income was derived, as required by law. Since the authorized officer did not inquire about the derivation of income during the search and considering relevant judicial precedents, the penalty was deemed unwarranted. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 680 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257746</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty imposed under Section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act, amounting to Rs. 12,50,00,000/-, was not justified. The Tribunal found that the assessee had specified and substantiated the manner in which the undisclosed income was derived, as required by law. Since the authorized officer did not inquire about the derivation of income during the search and considering relevant judicial precedents, the penalty was deemed unwarranted. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>