https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168669 A disciplinary tribunal is vitiated where a member's prior appearance for a complainant gives rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias, but that objection may be lost through knowing waiver or acquiescence. On the facts, the chairman was disqualified in principle, yet the appellant had knowledge of the relevant facts and allowed the tribunal to proceed without timely objection, so the challenge could not succeed. The Court also declined interference with concurrent findings of professional misconduct, including assistance in procuring a false stay order, and upheld removal from practice because no legal or procedural error justified reversal. en-us Wed, 06 Feb 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Jul 2025 13:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168669 A disciplinary tribunal is vitiated where a member's prior appearance for a complainant gives rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias, but that objection may be lost through knowing waiver or acquiescence. On the facts, the chairman was disqualified in principle, yet the appellant had knowledge of the relevant facts and allowed the tribunal to proceed without timely objection, so the challenge could not succeed. The Court also declined interference with concurrent findings of professional misconduct, including assistance in procuring a false stay order, and upheld removal from practice because no legal or procedural error justified reversal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Feb 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168669