<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (9) TMI 113 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168668</link>
    <description>The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 was upheld as a valid welfare measure against challenges under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The Court held that the Act disclosed clear legislative policy to prevent labour exploitation, gave sufficient guidance for wage fixation, and allowed the Government to choose between the prescribed methods for collecting data. It also accepted differential minimum wages by industry, locality and zone where supported by economic conditions, and held that valuation of free food supplied to employees as an amenity was valid. The notification and wage fixation were sustained, and the constitutional and statutory objections failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 12:57:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (9) TMI 113 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168668</link>
      <description>The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 was upheld as a valid welfare measure against challenges under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The Court held that the Act disclosed clear legislative policy to prevent labour exploitation, gave sufficient guidance for wage fixation, and allowed the Government to choose between the prescribed methods for collecting data. It also accepted differential minimum wages by industry, locality and zone where supported by economic conditions, and held that valuation of free food supplied to employees as an amenity was valid. The notification and wage fixation were sustained, and the constitutional and statutory objections failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>