<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 655 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257721</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the order directing the appellant to refund an amount to the official liquidator with interest, ruling in favor of the appellant. The Court found that the re-examination of the claim without notice violated principles of natural justice. Additionally, the Court awarded costs to the appellant for the harassment faced during the legal proceedings, emphasizing the importance of due process in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 03:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 655 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257721</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the order directing the appellant to refund an amount to the official liquidator with interest, ruling in favor of the appellant. The Court found that the re-examination of the claim without notice violated principles of natural justice. Additionally, the Court awarded costs to the appellant for the harassment faced during the legal proceedings, emphasizing the importance of due process in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>