<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 645 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257711</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The disallowance of unexplained expenditure was restricted to 0.25% of the sales, and the disallowance of depreciation on over-invoiced assets was deleted, following the precedents set in earlier assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 02:51:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 645 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257711</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The disallowance of unexplained expenditure was restricted to 0.25% of the sales, and the disallowance of depreciation on over-invoiced assets was deleted, following the precedents set in earlier assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>