<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 641 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257707</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (Appeals)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objections for Assessment Year 2008-09. The Tribunal confirmed the exemption claim under Section 54 / 54F, as the entire capital gains were invested in a new property before the due date under Section 139(4), following precedent set in Nipun Mehrotra.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 641 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257707</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (Appeals)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objections for Assessment Year 2008-09. The Tribunal confirmed the exemption claim under Section 54 / 54F, as the entire capital gains were invested in a new property before the due date under Section 139(4), following precedent set in Nipun Mehrotra.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>